Видео

A very good explanation. Thank you a lot.

could have made other lives easier and at least say the words "15,000" in the beginning, but great explanation overall thank you

the clearest and most helpful video! thank you

I never ever understand it till I hear it from you thank you so much 😊

videos are so helpful but not easy to find. I have spent 3 days looking for Canadian Bus. Law videos to no avail. I realized that with your title and description, it doesn't mention what you offer in your content, and you dont have the hashtags #s #s #s. #s would really help your content to be visible to many searching about law/ Canadian law/ negligence/ tort etc You'd have more views, shares and comments. Thank you for your videos they are so helpful

Your videos are so helpful but not easy to find. I have spent 3 days looking for Canadian Bus. Law videos to no avail. I realized that with your title and description, it doesn't mention what you offer in your content, and you dont have the hashtags #s #s #s. #s would really help your content to be visible to many searching about law/ Canadian law/ negligence/ tort etc You'd have more views, shares and comments. Thank you for your videos they are so helpful

Exactly what I was looking for. Thankyou. But can you tell me 4:59 what do you mean by this point. As it appears to be quite confusing to me

Very concise and straightforward. Thanks

Very well explain! Thank you so much! =D

Stop watching American RUclips Canadian laws are different. And it's your Charter of Rights and Freedoms not your Constitution

Copernic was first

If I fain would something like this to me woooo boy..Big trouble. Trust me. 😡🤬

Been watching this every year for the past 3 years around this time. Super helpful reminder how to do CCA calculations. Thanks!

👍🏿👍🏿👍🏿👍🏿👍🏿

So a plea to all Canadians ,,,,,you guys were more than happy to be independent of the English government Why would you then not fully support Scotland doing the same The Monarchy is a completely separate issue Republic or monarchist is not an issue at the present time and it will be up the the majority of Scottish residents to decide which one we adopt

What about the three branches of rhetoric that includes judicial? Aren’t the three branches of rhetoric simply the branches of government itself? Philosophy and law also have a close relationship to each other

The Statute Law Revision Act 1893(UK) repealed the Enacting Clause of the BNA1867, as well as Section 2 extending Queen Victoria's authority of and over Canada and her executive government to her heirs and successors. Queen Victoria died in 1901. Queen Elizabeth2( or any other Monarch since 1901) had no lawful authority to give Royal Assent to the Charter or any other Act or Statute

The Interpretation Act 1889(UK) clearly states Canada is a British Colony.

How is Canada's constitution legal when Quebec NEVER SIGNED UP??

🤍🤍🍁🍁

love the depth of the breakdown! everyone should see this playlist! 🤍🤍💯💯🍁🍁

The only one that helped me understand CCA and deductions, thank you!

Just did my taxes. I do uber eats half by car and half by ebike. My accountant said there is no way to deduct the ebike? Is this correct or do I need another accoutnant? The ebike cost $5000.

Do the same depreciation rules apply when buying a used car (in my case 2 year old car) for ones business?

Very well explained, thank you for sharing.

Thank you so much, very helpful info for the solicitors exam haha

What about color of law? The past 3 years.

You have a great voice for teaching law..you shhould consider making updated videos please!!! especially business law at it relates to the solictors exam!!!

The Patriation of the Constitution was not the signing of the Constitution Act, 1867 and the Constitution Act, 1982. The Queen signed into law the Canada Act. The Canada Act, a United Kingdom statute, created the latter as a constitutional document that recognized the former as part of the Constitution along with other constitutional documents and the unwritten Constitution.

very helpful video

Another helpful video.

Very helpful video

Very nice explanation of basic terms & easy to understand.

I'm still in disbelief about the queen passing and more disbelief in what's been ignored here it would seem

I'm still in disbelief about the queen passing and more disbelief in what's been ignored here it would seem

i learn a lot thank you for such an informative video🤩🤩 .

Crystal clear explanation. Thankyou

Is Canada a mining and harvesting operation masquerading as a country?

You explained 40 pages of my text book in 6 minutes. Thank you 🙏

We were Dominions, not colonies. Joesph Howe, was looking at Nova Scotia not joining.

How does the Irish Bermuda Holdco get the money to shareholders without it being taxed? If it doesn’t, then it’s only a timing issue; corps are holding money offshore until a favorable tax environment. If they are spending on ops overseas/ investing etc, that is what would happen in the US as well…namely it would not be taxed if spent on business purposes.

Continual ACT and Charter of Right's...breaking them a BREACHES or Contempt of a Court order???

Thanks. Useful.

Do we have the right to travel freely in canada with out drivers license and insurance like the U.S.

The CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982 is a flawed document. The very first line of Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms states" Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law". The issue is that it assumes a fact not in evidence - the existence of a God. This would make the first statement inadmissible in any court of competent jurisdiction. Secondly, there is no specificity as to which God the framers had in mind - there are many throughout history. How does one rationally formulate a legal description or interpretation of a deity?

Hi Prof, The Enacting Clause of the BNA/ Constitution Act of 1867 was repealed in 1893 by Q Viicoria. Re 1982, I believe there is a "Subject to" Clause in the Royal Proclamation that has not been lifted.

I just got done listening to Viva Clips where one of the lawyers Keith Wilson was speaking about the court case making a constitutional challenge to the mandates. Very interesting and so now I'm keen to follow this channel and others talking about the topic.

Thank you so much

amazing content! Thank you for such detailed and valuable information 😊

It is so excited and helpful to know about the Canadian law. I would recommend this presentation to every immigrated new Canadians.